NetApp RAID Configuration (ONTAP): Choosing the Right Level for Your Storage
- server-parts.eu server-parts.eu

- Dec 1, 2024
- 3 min read
Updated: Nov 1
In NetApp ONTAP, RAID protection is part of the local-tier (aggregate) design. ONTAP offers RAID-DP and RAID-TEC to protect against multiple, simultaneous disk failures without significant performance loss.
NetApp Storage & Parts: Save Up To 80%
✔️ 5-Year Warranty – No Risk: Pay Only After Testing
Picking the right protection level and RAID group size keeps usable capacity, protection, and rebuild risk balanced.
RAID options in NetApp ONTAP
NetApp RAID4
Single parity.
Protects from one disk failure in a RAID group.
Considered legacy.
NetApp RAID-DP (double parity)
Survives two simultaneous disk failures in the same RAID group.
Parity calculations occur in memory, minimizing write penalties.
Suitable for most mixed or transactional workloads.
Can be converted from RAID-TEC when triple parity is no longer needed.
NetApp RAID-TEC (triple erasure coding)
Survives three simultaneous disk failures in a RAID group.
Designed for large-capacity media with long rebuild times.
ONTAP uses it automatically for capacity HDD tiers (6 TB or larger).
Works on all disk types, including SSDs, and supports large RAID groups.
When to use each NetApp ONTAP (RAID)
NetApp RAID-DP: Use it for databases, virtual machines, and general-purpose NAS or SAN workloads. It offers a good balance between efficiency and fault tolerance.
NetApp RAID-TEC: Use it for high-capacity HDD tiers where rebuilds take longer and the probability of multiple failures is higher. It is standard for data-intensive capacity tiers, archival systems, and large FlexGroup environments.
RAID group sizing - NetApp ONTAP
NetApp guidance:
NetApp HDD or array-LUN RAID groups: 12–20 disks recommended. Up to 28 disks possible on high-performance drives.
NetApp SSD RAID-DP groups: 20–28 disks recommended.All RAID groups in the same aggregate should have similar sizes. Larger groups provide higher usable capacity but increase the time a system runs in a degraded state.
Creating aggregates RAID in NetApp ONTAP (CLI)
NetApp RAID-DP example:
storage aggregate create -aggregate aggr_data01 -node node1 -diskcount 20 -raidtype raid_dp
NetApp RAID-TEC example:
storage aggregate create -aggregate aggr_cap01 -node node1 -diskcount 20 -raidtype raid_tec
ONTAP can automatically select disks from spare pools or you can define a specific disk list. You can also specify maximum RAID group size when creating the aggregate.
Monitoring and replacing failed disks (RAID) - NetApp ONTAP
Check aggregate and RAID status:
storage aggregate show
storage aggregate show-status -aggregate <name>
Find failed disks:
storage disk show -state broken
Assign a replacement disk (only when auto-assignment is disabled):
storage disk assign -disk <disk_name> -pool 0
Select the correct pool (0 or 1) according to your MetroCluster or SyncMirror setup.Active IQ Unified Manager or Digital Advisor can provide early alerts before a RAID group becomes at risk.
Rebuild time considerations (RAID) - NetApp ONTAP
Larger disks and larger RAID groups increase rebuild time. RAID-TEC reduces the risk of a second or third failure during rebuild by adding extra parity protection. Exact rebuild duration depends on disk capacity, workload, and controller load.
Converting RAID-TEC to RAID-DP - NetApp ONTAP
If a capacity tier shrinks or triple parity is unnecessary, you can convert:
storage aggregate modify -aggregate <name> -raidtype raid_dp
Verify status:
storage aggregate show <name>
Conversion is allowed only when the RAID group meets RAID-DP limits.
NetApp Storage & Parts: Save Up To 80%
✔️ 5-Year Warranty – No Risk: Pay Only After Testing
Sources - NetApp ONTAP
NetApp ONTAP 9 Documentation Center – RAID protection for local tiers (aggregates)
NetApp TR-3838: Storage Subsystem Configuration Guide
NetApp ONTAP 9 Documentation – Default RAID policies for local tiers
NetApp ONTAP 9 Documentation – RAID groups sizing & local tiers
NetApp ONTAP 9 Documentation – Manage local tiers overview






Comments